SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (4463)11/13/2003 4:10:51 AM
From: zonder  Read Replies (1) of 20773
 
Hi Hawk - Long time no see :-)

As for your post, it is kind of irrelevant to what we were discussing, so I can only assume you are looking for a fight for old times' sake.

Sorry, I don't have that kind of time anymore. But just one little sentence to remind you what I used to say to you, kind of repetitively, which you could never refute, because... well... it is a fact:

Iraq signed a cease fire accord, not a peace treaty. Violating the terms of the cease fire could, at the discretion of the other beliggerents could be grounds for reinitiating hostilities.

Iraq signed the "accord" with the UN as the counterparty. Not the US.

That means the only party who could decide on any hostilities as a countermeasure was the UN. Not the US.

And no amount of quotation from various UN resolutions is going to change that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News