SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 215.040.0%11:38 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Petz who wrote (105775)11/14/2003 4:47:06 AM
From: Gopher BrokeRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
I'm apparently the only person on the planet that thinks this is a possibility

Not at all, I agree with you.

My reasoning is different.
- To make Prescott a full 64 bit CPU Intel would have had to start work on it three years ago.
- They would have to be discussing the instruction set with compiler writers a couple of years ago.
- Initial samples to OEMs a year ago.

It would be impossible to keep all that completely quiet.
So whatever they have done in Prescott has to be a lot smaller development effort and requiring less testing.

If I were Intel I would have come up with the smallest possible change to Prescott that could be labelled as "64-bit" and then let my formidable marketing team go to work.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext