SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Cambridge Antibody Technology Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jongmans who started this subject11/17/2003 11:39:10 AM
From: nigel bates  Read Replies (1) of 625
 
Some comment on the Humira litigation:

UPDATE - UK's CAT sues Abbott over drug royalties
Monday November 17, 10:45 am ET
By Mark Potter

LONDON, Nov 17 (Reuters) - Britain's Cambridge Antibody Technology Group Plc (London:CAT.L - News; CAT) said on Monday it was taking its partner Abbott Laboratories Inc. (NYSE:ABT - News) to court over the level of royalties it receives for its one marketed drug, Humira.

The biotechnology firm had previously hoped mediation would resolve the dispute with the U.S. company, which says it can deduct royalties for third parties from the amount it pays to CAT for Humira, a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis.

"Given the scale of the likely sales of Humira and therefore the scale of likely royalties to CAT, we absolutely have the resources and determination to see this to a successful conclusion," CAT Chief Executive Peter Chambre told Reuters.

He said CAT was sticking to its position that it should get royalties amounting to a mid single digit percentage of Humira sales, which Abbott says could eventually top $1 billion a year.

Jennifer Smoter, a spokeswoman for Abbott, said, "We will defend our position vigorously in court."

Companies in charge of selling a drug often have to pay royalties, or a cut of sales, to a number of firms involved in the drug's discovery, development and manufacture.

Analysts were disappointed the case had reached court and concerned at the time and cost of a legal dispute.

"This process will undoubtedly result in further costs and, until resolved (we estimate up to two years), reduced revenues, as Abbott only pays the royalty it believes it owes CAT," said Keith Redpath, an industry analyst at Panmure, who cut his investment rating on CAT shares to "neutral" from "outperform."

At 1540 GMT, the shares were 1.6 percent lower at 472-1/2 pence.

WIDER LOSS

CAT's Chambre said the court case could be resolved in the next 12-18 months. He declined to say how much it might cost but noted that CAT had spent about two million to three million pounds a year during past legal disputes over patents.

CAT, which specialises in developing drugs from antibodies, the body's natural defences against disease, had a net loss of 39.2 million pounds ($66.2 million) in the year to Sept. 30, compared with a loss of 28.2 million pounds the year before.

This left the firm with 107.8 million pounds of cash.

Chambre said CAT would continue to increase spending on a small number of experimental medicines, with net cash outflow likely to rise to about 27 million pounds in the year to September 2004 from 21.9 million the year before.

CAT has enough money to last three years and will bridge the gap to profitability in 2008 by licensing its experimental drugs to partners, striking merger and acquisition deals, selling shares, or a combination of all three, he said.

Chambre said it was likely to recruit a partner for Trabio, an experimental treatment for post-operative scarring in glaucoma patients, after Phase III clinical trials next year. CAT had previously said it might find a partner this year. (Additional reporting by Toni Clarke in New York) ...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext