SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: American Spirit who wrote (1101)11/17/2003 3:24:14 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) of 90947
 
1. I have nothing to apologize for, though I am sorry you reading comprehension is so weak.

2. In spite of your inability to provide a valid link, I found your article. For the benefit of everyone else, I'll quote some key points from it here:

THE SURVEY BY Marist College’s Institute for Public Opinion found that 44 percent of the voters questioned said they planned to definitely vote against the Republican president while 38 percent said they would support his re-election.
...
The Marist poll had the president’s approval rating at 53 percent, down from 70 percent in its April poll. [didn't all the major polls have him over 80% last spring?]
...
In theoretical matchups against the Democrats, Bush led them all. Closest to the president — 48 percent to 43 percent — was Gephardt.

Marist’s telephone poll of 788 registered voters was conducted Oct. 27-29 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

Seems a bit odd, doesn't it, that while 44% of those 788 voters said they would "definitely vote against" Bush and only 38% said they would vote FOR him, the best any candidate could do against him among those same 788 people is to lose 48% to 43%. Maybe some of them intend to "vote against" Bush by voting for Nader, Cynthia McKinney or some other guaranteed loser. Or maybe you should consider a broader array of major polls instead of focusing entirely on one apparently quirky number from one small poll.

msnbc.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News