SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MKTBUZZ who started this subject11/19/2003 1:14:50 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
IRAQ AND AL QAEDA

In its cover story this week, The Weekly Standard presented
classified intelligence data concerning the relationship between
Saddam Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda.

The Standard article, written by Stephen F. Hayes and rather
presumptuously entitled "Case Closed," is based on a classified
letter sent by Under Secretary of Defense Douglas Feith to the
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. It cites numerous
reports of contacts between Iraqi officials and al Qaeda that
appear to indicate an operational relationship between the two.
The article is posted here:

tinyurl.com

But in a remarkable if oddly worded dismissal, the Pentagon stated
that "News reports that the Defense Department recently confirmed
new information with respect to contacts between al-Qaida and
Iraq in a letter to the Senate Intelligence Committee are
inaccurate."

The Feith letter "was not an analysis of the substantive issue of
the relationship between Iraq and al Qaida, and it drew no
conclusions," the Pentagon said.

Furthermore, "Individuals who leak or purport to leak classified
information are doing serious harm to national security; such
activity is deplorable and may be illegal."

defenselink.mil

It is in the nature of raw intelligence reports that they are
susceptible to multiple interpretations, some more plausible than
others. Even reliably accurate data can mean radically different
things depending on the larger context. That is why intelligence
reports are subjected to analysis, and not simply siphoned
directly to policy makers. The Weekly Standard article in effect
bypassed the analytical process, yielding a sensational but
hardly conclusive result.

Stephen F. Hayes today responded to the Defense Department's
statement regarding his story in the Weekly Standard online here:

tinyurl.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext