SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rat dog micro-cap picks...

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bucky Katt who wrote (15741)11/21/2003 11:11:43 AM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) of 48461
 
The Bush administration's increasing focus on a re-election in 2004 has
resulted in an alarming new development - one that may turn out to be the
shot across the bow that leads to a full blown international trade war.
This was of course yesterday's imposition of import quotas on certain kinds
of textiles from China. This is the first action of its kind, and by itself
seems relatively innocuous, but once you announce one quota or tariff,
you're likely going to announce additional ones, and the other side feels
it must retaliate and back and forth and round and round in a vicious
cycle. If these are the first salvos in a new trade war, the only possible
outcome is the destruction of globalization - and a complete disaster for
the world economy, much like the one we saw in the thirties.
The textile import quota was an early Christmas present to the South in the
US, where since 1997, 250 textile companies have ceased operation and more
than 200,000 workers have lost their jobs. It's also creates a trend since
it comes after the Bush administration's 2002 pandering to steel industry
cronies with the implementation of tariffs on foreign steel. The proposal
is also intended, poorly conceived though it may be, as a method of
ameliorating the staggering and accelerating US trade deficit.
Clearly, the closer we get to election day, the more the administration's
agenda is shifting from plain old "growth" to "job growth". The
administration's every effort from now until election day will focus on job
creation, regardless of the economic consequences. The fact that every
Economics 101 graduate knows that trade barriers and the like are economic
suicide need not get in the way, as long as the administration can chalk up
real or imagined job growth.
Let's backtrack a bit to see how we got to where we are today and why trade
barriers would cause such calamity. The vast majority of US growth over the
last 10 years has been made possible by an unparalleled and unsustainable
credit boom engendered by historically low interest rates. The interest
rate trend has only been possible because of the deflationary effects of
productivity and the globalization of production - which always moves the
production of goods to the cheapest source. This, combined with the US
Dollar's special status as the world's reserve currency has saved the world
from inflationary pressures.
This might all be coming to an end. The Bush administration, if it promotes
protectionist measures, would be aborting the entire beneficial cycle that
has brought the US economy to where it stands today. A trade war fuelled by
domestic populist ("Buy American!" and "Protect American jobs!") sentiments
at this point would have cataclysmic impact on the purchasing power of the
dollar and would start a new and viciously inflationary cycle. First, the
weakening dollar trend all by itself will at some point bring higher import
prices and inflationary pressure. Second, prices in the US would rise
dramatically in a tariff-rich environment, causing an increase in interest
rates. A rise in interest rates shuts down the cheap credit addicted
American consumer and the booming mortgage market, which will derail the
consumer-driven American economy. Shutting down the American consumption
engine also shuts down export economies that depend on it. The babies you
throw out in this particular ocean of bathwater are the buyers of American
treasuries, and therefore the financers of the colossal US Budget Deficit:
take Southeast Asia, for example. Together, Japan, China, South Korea and
Taiwan currently hold about $1.3 trillion in reserves - most of them in US
Dollars - about the same as the entire M1 money supply in the US. For
years, the Southeast Asian countries have been sending real goods and
services in return for a growing government stock pile of dollars, for
which they have no use. Taken by itself, this is an unsustainable trend -
and a trade war would only serve to rapidly accelerate its demise.
Suddenly you have a world in economic hurt that is awash in dollars, a
world that can no longer finance the spiralling US Budget Deficits. The
inflationary effects of this are almost unimaginable. With so many holders
of this debt and not enough new buyers, there will be an unprecedented
imbalance in buyers and sellers of both US Dollars and US-denominated
treasuries. The exit window for this sorry lot of holders will not
accommodate everyone at once - only a massively depreciated US Dollar and
higher US interest rates would bring things back into balance.
The end result: low growth with massive inflation, higher gold prices, a
massive bear market for US Treasuries, and new lows in the US stock market.
This may be early days, but this administration is clearly too shortsighted
to cope with the impending problems of the US economy. It may sacrifice the
global economy in its bid for re-election in 2004.

Good Health, Good Fortune, and Good Trading

Ron Jaenisch

CC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext