SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (496645)11/21/2003 11:23:50 AM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (5) of 769667
 
A REAL general SPEAKS
Clark Accuses Bush of 'Wrecking' NATO
The Democratic hopeful also urges rebuilding the alliance as a foundation of U.S. national security.

By James Gerstenzang, Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — Retired Gen. Wesley K. Clark on Thursday accused the
Bush administration of shredding America's historic ties with Europe and
proposed rebuilding the Atlantic alliance as a foundation of U.S. national
security.

"This administration has been all bully and no pulpit," Clark said in a speech
that detailed an approach to U.S. relations with post-World War II allies that
established a clear policy difference with President Bush and underlined his
extensive military career — a background that sets him apart from his rivals
for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Delivered to the Council
on Foreign Relations in
New York just hours
after Bush met in
London with British
Prime Minister Tony
Blair, Clark's speech
was particularly blunt, in
both tenor and political
content. It reflected the
degree to which the
long-held adage that U.S. political squabbles stop
"at the water's edge" had been eroded in recent
years.

In challenging Bush's dealings with long-standing
allies in Europe, Clark plunged into a sensitive area, addressing what he saw as a central weakness in
the administration's foreign policy just as the president had been trying to shore up his most loyal major
ally in the Iraq war.

In London, Bush defended a policy that prompted widespread and angry dissent throughout Western
Europe. But Clark, a former NATO supreme commander, said Bush's presence "is actually
undermining a brave and decent British prime minister who has been an extraordinary friend to America
… " Broadening his critique, Clark added, "Simply put, this administration is wrecking NATO — and
thereby doing incalculable damage to our security and well-being.

"They've alienated our friends, dismissed their concerns, rejected their advice. They're leaving America
an isolated nation," he said.

Since launching his candidacy in mid-September, much of Clark's focus has been on foreign policy —
an arena once perceived as Bush's strong point. But the continuing turmoil in Iraq has eroded public
confidence in the president on this issue, according to recent polls.

Clark, in criticizing the administration's rebuilding efforts in Iraq, has called for deploying NATO troops
there. And last week, in faulting Bush's handling of the overall war on terrorism, he unveiled a plan that
included enlisting Saudi commandos in the hunt for Osama bin Laden.

In his Thursday speech, Clark called for a new Atlantic Charter "to meet the new threats of terrorism
and weapons of mass destruction, as well as to strengthen our response to the old threats that are still
with us."

He said the U.S. and its allies must "deal with failed states before their chaos spawns terrorism, misery
or mass murder."

Clark made his military reputation as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's supreme commander,
particularly during the 1999 Kosovo conflict. His plan would draw on NATO to address 21st century
problems that were far from the concerns when the alliance was first assembled and fighting
Communism was its overarching goal.

Criticizing the administration for its policy and the mechanics it has employed in addressing the new
threats, Clark said: "The bottom line is this: The Bush administration is not interested in permanent
alliances. It treats them, even NATO, as obstacles — a limitation on America's freedom of action.
Instead of enduring partnerships, it prefers to build temporary coalitions of the willing, consisting of
nations, however weak, that are willing to do exactly what we say."

The result, the candidate said, has been "this long international nightmare," in which the Bush
administration has "squandered in two years the moral authority America spent generations building."

As outlined by Clark, under a new Atlantic Charter, "America must declare its commitment to work
with its democratic allies as a first, not last, resort. European allies should make the same commitment."

The allied nations also would commit themselves to improving existing global treaties, among them the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Biological Weapons Convention, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty and — in marked contrast with the Bush administration, the Kyoto agreement on global
warming.

Reflecting the new demands the alliance would face, Clark called for an agreement on diplomatic,
economic and legal responses to face such current threats as terrorism, "ethnic cleansing," the
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the potential chaos of the "failed states."

And he pledged a bolstered role for the United States in the stumbling search for peace between Israel
and the Palestinians, as part of what he said should be the effort by Washington and its allies to heal the
conflicts that fuel wider discontent and terrorism.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext