Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sully- who wrote (17106)	11/21/2003 9:04:44 PM
From: MSI	Read Replies (1) of 793718

You don't think that Operation Iron Hammer has anything to do with the increased number of attacks? The idea is to reduce the number of attacks on US military and civilians. If those attacks are reduced, that would be a good thing. However, we are seeing attacks increase. There are more dead and wounded since "Mission Accomplished" than during the mission, this number is not decreasing but is accelerating. The solution is to internationalize the occupation. To do that requires relinquishing absolute control and dole of the profiteering contracts in the hundred billion or so range, not to mention control of oil revenues, that the adminstration hastily declares not of interest, yet retains control of. The US excuse is that "we did the job, we should control the result". Two wrongs don't make a right. Allowing shared control would povide incentive, preventing control prevents it, and provides further recruiting incentives to fight "imperialist US". It was announced today that further escalation of attacks are expected on US military and diplomatic corps.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next