SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Attack Iraq?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lorne who wrote (8350)11/24/2003 5:32:28 AM
From: Cogito   of 8683
 
>>You seem to believe I have a particular position and I fall in line with some political agenda. Is this correct?<<

Lorne -

No, not necessarily. I was just responding to the article you posted about the leaked top-secret memo that purportedly proves that Al Qaeda and Hussein were linked. Since you were the one who posted the article, the response was addressed to you. The term "neo-con", however, was meant to be applied generally to the dominant voices on this thread.

I noticed that a couple of posters here simply took the article at face value, as definitive proof that such a link existed, and didn't seem to have any problem with the leaking of the memo.

The reason I brought up the question of whether anyone might be concerned about the leak is that I can see a double standard being employed by many of the conservatives on this thread.

I believe that if a liberal paper had published an article based on a leaked top-secret memo that detailed how the Bush administration first decided to go to war with Iraq and then started trying to find ways to justify that, people like GZ would be calling the author and editors traitors, and demanding an investigation into the leak.

If you're more reasonable than that, I'm glad to hear it.

- Allen

PS: I would define "neo-con" as describing adherents to the currently fashionable conservative ideology espoused by the Bush Administration.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext