Yes, I know the conservative song regarding "socialized" medicine. Unfortunately for you, the facts do not support it.
Here is a comparison of health care spending in four countries of roughly equal per capita income: USA, France, Germany, Switzerland.
policyalmanac.org
The facts:
France, Germany, Switzerland have had "socialized" medicine for more than a generation. The USA does not.
The USA spent 13.5% of its GDP on health care in 1997. The others spent 10%.
The USA has an infant mortality of 6.75; the three others 4.37, 4.23, and 4.36.
The USA has a life expectancy of 77.14; the others 79.28, 78.42, 79.99
Source: cia.gov
Interestingly, all three "socialized medicine" countries have populations that are older than the US. If we were as old as them, we would spend even more on health care.
Finally, the brave efforts that the US makes to save infant lives should logically decrease US infant mortality relatively to the others. If, as you imply, they let gravely ill infants die, their infant mortality rates should be adversely affected, no? The sad fact is that US infant mortality is so high because of lack of prenatal care for large segments of the population.
I think the facts speak for themselves, unless you are blinded by ideology. |
