SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC )

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jw who wrote (14339)11/25/2003 12:37:43 PM
From: Ira Player  Read Replies (1) of 14778
 
After a few false starts, I'm currently using RAID in the following way and am very happy with the results and performance.

All software and files that are available on CD's for recovery on a RAID 0 array identified as the boot disk. RAID 0 gives a performance boost because it stripes the data across 2 disks. However, it doubles the 'odds' that a disk failure will take you down. Since I only place replaceable software on that 'drive', I prefer the speed over safety. Virtual memory swaps are much faster with this set up, for example.

All data and critical files are on a second RAID array, set up as RAID 1, mirrored. I have not had a disk failure yet, so do not know how effective it is, but on a single drive failure, I can continue to operate and should be able to install a replacement drive and have the data rebuilt automatically.

Ira

ps: I still back up critical data to a DVD weekly...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext