Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (17841)	11/26/2003 6:35:24 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 793707

Hi Nadine, Regarding your Begin/Thatcher post. I asked this question earlier and no one responded. It is my belief from way back when Begin took over that the settlements moved from being a future bargaining chip for arab world recognition of israel to part of an expansionist Likud agenda. During the period when Likud ran the show until Rabin, the settlements masked an attempt for a Greater Israel. During that period opportunities for peace may have been missed. Now 90% of the settlements are back in bargaining chip clothes, but given that Sharon is part of likud, pals may not buy this just as israelis will find it hard to buy a Pal acceptance of Lesser Israel or even Lessest israel(mandate). Do you think this Likud Greater Israel view during the 70s and 80s trumped bargaining chip status and hindered the chances for peace during that period and beyond? As a pro-Israel but anti-greater Israel guy, this question always gnaws at me. Mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next