Investment Chat Board Lawsuits Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: dantecristo who wrote (5394)	11/29/2003 1:17:27 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) of 12465

Mary, assuming the Supreme Court does affirm that it's not legal to force someone to trial prior to a ruling on their appeal of being denied a Motion to Strike, which I think they should, what would be the likely result? Logically (according to me, a non-lawyer), one would assume the first step would be to "suspend" the trial and ask the appellate court to make a ruling. I think it safe to say (based on the trial results, which, granted, should never have taken place), that you'd lose the appeal. Then what? Un-suspend the trial? Order a new one? If I had to choose, I'd say they'd probably order a new trial simply because of the undue burden placed on you and your attorneys in being forced to trial. Won't that be fun. - Jeff

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next