Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (18136)	11/30/2003 9:49:31 AM
From: quehubo	Read Replies (1) of 793696

<<That is going to give us the bottom line from them without the people being here.>> Becareful there Lindy, I guess the bottom line you are talking about is the corporate bottom line. Because the jobs are not being created, they are being moved. GE may have reduced its employment costs in the USA, but they were transferred to the US taxpayer. Yes our neighbor who worked for GE in customer service costing GE $11 an hour is now on welfare because she was replaced by an Indian for $1.50 hour. While the loss of these jobs cascades through the economy, GE and others will be thinking of how to move more tax exposure off shore so they can decrease US corporate income taxes as well. The more I think about it the more I think we should import more of the most qualified workers. Even if the typical immigrant is over qualified education wise for the position compared to an qualifed unemployed American, if the choice is between import the worker or export the job I prefer to keep the position here. I doubt there would be any objections by the potential immigrants.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next