SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: P2V who wrote (12697)11/30/2003 6:13:33 PM
From: Quincy  Read Replies (1) of 12823
 
Again, Wi-MAX implies only a set of standard tests for
one or more versions of 802.16 (currently fixed) wireless..
all of which operate above 5 ghz.
Currently it's major applications will consist of
Interconnecting those Wireless , or Wired (does not matter
which) Hotspots .

Also , underserved areas will certainly use Wi-MAX with
SECTORED Antennas (not omni-directional) to act as a
replacement for xDSL service, and/or Cable Modem service.

System On a Chip circuits are only now being developed,
and surely they will NOT be suitable for a PCS phone...
I don't know of any FOOL who says otherwise.


In other words, it has tradeoffs to be tackled for consideration as a 3G replacement or portable VOIP.

Your anti-5ghz rhetoric, omni-directional antennae, and
food containers serve no use, other than to make you look silly and unwilling to learn.... however I appreciate
the fact that you have moved away somewhat from that foolishness.


If WiMax is not yet a feasable handheld replacement to 3G, free of unique coverage constraints, why is it being discussed as a threat to 3G deployment already underway?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext