Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (79324)	12/1/2003 5:55:47 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (2) of 82486

"A river has the right to remain unpoluted from the neglect or deliberate malice of its keepers" I am trying to follow you: You seem to be saying that the right of a river is the obligation of a person. A river does not have consciousness, does it? So are you talking about the supposed rights of insentient matter??? or are you talking about the supposed obligations of humans to rocks, mud, and water??? How is the nature of a river helped or hindered by pollution? Is the river conscious?? "Although the greatest wrong is done to your own soul" What are you talking about? Has any university or medical facility ever recognized a "soul"? If you get cancer do we operate on your "soul"??

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next