WHO KILLED KENNEDY
Rick,
Re: .>........so you agree, Kennedy was killed by big business, not by Cubans, not by Communists, not by Mafia (?), but by big business
Big business, the CIA and and the Middle America Foundation for Industry and Assets (Mafia) all operate on the basis of terrorist cells. They operate in small cells with "plausible deniability" for their actions being of supreme importance to them, at least until recently when they've managed to seize control of the Department of Justice, much of the court system and the SEC and have forced the abandonment of prosecution of big business, the CIA and the Mafia.
I tend to agree with the speculation expressed in the History Channel series on "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" that the men who actually pulled the triggers of the sniper's rifles were brought in by the Mafia. Most likely from the Marseilles heroin connection. However, the Mafia did not instigate the assassination, but was put up to the job by rogue elements (state terror cells) operating within the CIA on behalf of the men who actually ran them from "the Commanding Heights™" of business. Each layer of this 'enigma, inside of a puzzle, inside of a conundrum' to paraphrase conspirator David Ferry's description achieved plausible deniability. This was the escape hatch for New Orleans businessman, Clay Shaw. He could never being "beyond the shadow of a doubt" associated with the hit men. Who were themselves being cast into plausible deniability by the warped fantasy of the Warren Commission's conclusions.
Deny, deny, deny..... that's been the modus operandi of the most successful terrorist organization in the world since the end of WW II, when certain mafia chieftains ( speaking of mafia in the broadest sense of the word and including in it men like General Lyman Lemnitzer and General Curtis LeMay) have only one goal in mind, the conquest of the planet and the imposition of the American Empire.
Only in the late 1990s were these people emboldened enough to come out from the shadows and actually state publicly, categorically and definitely what the goal is. As expressed in PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" white paper, it is stated beyond any shadow of a doubt that America's defense logically demands the conquest of the entire planet.
So, who killed Kennedy? We might want to ask a spooky CIA operative with close connections to the oil industry and to PNAC, and who cannot account for his whereabouts on November 22, 1963. We might want to ask George Herbert Walker Bush.
Re: not by Cubans, not by Communists,
Oh, puleeeze, the Cuban Communists are only a 'red herring' spread on investigators' trails in order to confuse the case. They were merely a 'straw man' enemy used by the M-I Complex as a propaganda tool against American public opinion. al Qaeda serves exactly the same purpose today, uniting the weak-minded and non-analytically inclined in society to unite behind a strong leader against a common, foreign (and hopefully swarthy and ugly) enemy. At least that's how the propaganda needs to be created.
It worked for Hitler, it worked for Tojo, it worked for Stalin. Why shouldn't it work for Bush?
********
"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England nor in America nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." -- Herman Goering,
More interesting detail on Goering at Nuremberg: snopes.com |
