SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : World Affairs Discussion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ChinuSFO who wrote (2887)12/3/2003 12:55:11 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) of 3959
 
I could even agree with some of the points in the article, if the author didn't express them in such demagogic, cartoonish terms:

This war, should it come, is intended to mark the official emergence of the United States as a full-fledged global empire... It would be the culmination of a plan 10 years or more in the making, carried out by those who believe the United States must seize the opportunity for global domination

As proof, he notes that we still have bases in Germany in Japan, 57 years after the end of WWII. Well, excuse me, but it is news to me that we consider Germany and Japan tributory provinces of our American empire, or that they consider themselves subjects of the empire either. Tell you what, let's ask any Germans posting to this thread if they consider themselves Subjects of the Empire.

Is it just possible that there are degrees of influence between none at all and outright rule, something more along the lines of a sphere of influence? The author doesn't seem to think so, so the possibility is never discussed, nor any likely alternative outcomes. The proposed American war is contrasted against some unarticulated but far better outcome - whose actual parameters always seem to remain fuzzy, and which skip over hard problems.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext