SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GENEVA ACCORD

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (64)12/8/2003 4:02:14 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (1) of 190
 
Re: Let's take a quick look at the leadership of the Americans, Israelis and Palestinians for the last 30 years.

America: Nixon. Ford. Carter. Reagan. Bush. Clinton. Bush II.

Israel: Meir. Shamir. Perez. Begin. Rabin. Perez. Netanyahu. Barak. Sharon.


I don't think that the "resident in the White House" is the main variable in the US equation.... Of course, domestically speaking, the US Prez does have some leeway: he can cut taxes, issue Executive Orders, appoint (supreme) justices, etc... However, when it comes to foreign politics, the President must face a bureaucratic inertia of sorts --he just can't make a U-turn on any major foreign issue. And that's especially true for an American president whose tenure is limited to four years or eight years if re-elected. Hence it's been customary for US presidents to wait until their re-election to engage in any "reshuffling" of sensible issues... Such was the case for JFK in 1963 as regards the civil rights...

Anyway, bureaucratic inertia is rather substantial in the US... Remember that you had the same FBI director for 48 years!!!!! J. Edgar Hoover directed the BI (renamed FBI in 1935) from 1924 until his death in 1972... Your Supreme Court Chief Justice was appointed by... Nixon in 1971!!!!(*) Not to mention the Pentagon's clout and the US's sprawling military-intelligence apparatus... Really, the US prez is but a pawn, however important, among them.

Besides, your logic is flawed when applied to royalties... Let's take a quick look at... say, Britain? Her Majesty Queen Elisabeth II for the past 50 years! Japan, another US ally: Emperor Hiro Hito (crowned in 1926) and son Akihito... Holland? Queen Beatrix... Belgium? Leopold III, Baldwin, and Albert II... Spain? Francesco Franco and King Juan Carlos.

Contrariwise, a constantly alternating leadership doesn't entail an alternating foreign policy --for instance, what was the US policy towards Cuba since 1961? Embargo. Embargo. Embargo. Embargo. Embargo....

Gus

(*) In 1971, an ailing Supreme Court Justice John Harlan retired and Nixon nominated Rehnquist to replace him. The Senate approved his nomination by a vote of 68-26 and Rehnquist was sworn into the court in January 1972. Rehnquist served as an associate justice until 1986 when Chief Justice Warren Berger retired and President Ronald Reagan nominated Rehnquist to head up the high court. Despite concerns from liberals in the Senate about what Rehnquist's conservative philosophy would mean to the high court, he was approved by a vote of 65-33.
[...]

pbs.org
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext