SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bridge Player who wrote (19115)12/8/2003 9:47:33 PM
From: MSI  Read Replies (1) of 793717
 
The detail behind the numbers may tell a different story.

For example, in today's IBD, page 7,

" 65% of Americans blame Bush policies for the weak job market"

"Three-fourths of Americans (74%) still say it is very difficult or somewhat difficult to get a job these days in their neighborhood"

" 150,000 jobs is well below the administration's predictions. The president's Council of Economic Advisors said in February the White House's 'Jobs and Growth Plan' would create 5.5 million jobs by the end of 2004. That would be 306,000 new jobs each month, starting in July 2003 when the plan went into effect.
November's 57,000 new jobs fell 249,000 jobs short of the plan"

----------------

That 65% "blame Bush" number includes a goodly percentage of Republicans who are otherwise giving Bush a pass on the wearying war on terror, so far.

The polls don't measure the depth of conviction very well. The level of anger is phenomenal. I suspect the opposition is a bit more entrenched in their position.

There are also Repubs becoming angry at administration policies, who could be part of the 90% because they think Bush is doing as well as can be expected, but blame his advisors. If so, they are swing, not base voters.

IMO
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext