SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : CVTX - CV Therapeutics, Inc.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tom pope who wrote (134)12/9/2003 2:40:43 PM
From: scaram(o)uche   of 411
 
well, down at this market cap and with oooooooodles of cash, it's worth the time to look at the company as though there is no ranexa..........

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003 Oct;307(1):182-9. Epub 2003 Sep 03

Comparative profile of vasodilation by CVT-3146, a novel A2A receptor agonist, and adenosine in conscious dogs.

Zhao G, Linke A, Xu X, Ochoa M, Belloni F, Belardinelli L, Hintze TH.

CV Therapeutics, Inc., Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. gong.zhao@cvt.com

The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of vasodilation by CVT-3146 in different vascular beds and to compare it with that by adenosine in conscious dogs. Intravenous bolus injections of CVT-3146 (0.1-2.5 microg/kg) or adenosine (10-250 microg/kg) caused a dose-dependent increase in the coronary blood flow (CBF) and a dose-dependent decrease in the late diastolic coronary resistance. Although the maximal increase in CBF response to the two drugs was not significantly different, the ED50 of CVT-3146 and adenosine were 0.45 +/- 0.07 microg/kg and 47 +/- 7.77 microg/kg, respectively. The highest dose of CVT-3146 caused a much longer coronary vasodilation than the highest dose of adenosine. There were no significant differences in increases in cardiac output induced by higher doses of CVT-3146 or adenosine. Most importantly, CVT-3146 resulted in a smaller decrease in total peripheral resistance (TPR) compared to that seen with adenosine. In addition, CVT-3146 yielded a smaller increase in the lower body flow (LBF) than adenosine. Adenosine also caused dose-dependent renal vasoconstriction, whereas CVT-3146 did not affect the renal blood flow. The administration of CVT-3146 or adenosine caused a dose-dependent vasodilation in the mesentery, which was not significantly different from each other. In summary, CVT-3146 is a 100-fold more potent coronary vasodilator than adenosine. CVT-3146 causes smaller decreases in TPR and smaller increases in LBF than those induced by adenosine, indicating that it is more selective for coronary than peripheral vasodilation. Furthermore, CVT-3146 did not cause renal vasoconstriction. These features make CVT-3146 a better candidate for pharmacologic stress testing.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext