Rande Is . . . HOME Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bob who wrote (56403)	12/11/2003 5:47:45 PM
From: Rande Is	Read Replies (1) of 57584

Hi, Bob. Good to hear from you too. Thanks for the correction. However, I believe that its name alone is enough to float it in a basket of nanotechs. Remember the fuel cell rage? What was it EFTC? . . .they made batteries. They put out news saying they had no fuel cell products. Their stock continued to gain on the association. Next thing you know, the company announces they have a fuel cell for cell phones. LOL I guess you could say that they progressed technologically due to customer demand. . . .and you'd be right. Or you could say that perception is reality. And you would also be right. In one year, if NANO has nothing to do with nano technologies, I'll eat my sugar-frosted binary-coded nano-words. Rande Is

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next