Impeach George W. Bush Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jttmab who wrote (23842)	12/16/2003 2:47:22 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) of 93284

My counter argument [question] is how can someone [legislative body] with absolutely no knowledge of any facts of the case determine better than a jury, who hears all of the facts of a case, what an appropriate award is? You make a flawed assumption here. Juries are never given "all the facts" of a case. Judges maintain a lot of discretion and there is a global body of law regarding what information must be excluded from presentation to a jury. Juries are also prone to irrationality, being unduly influenced by effective lawyering, bouts of vindictiveness, fiscal irresponsibility and other flaws. I don't find the present jury system for tort actions to be intelligently managed in the United States. I've looked into other systems, Holland's comes to mind here, where entire classes of settlements have become settled law on the basis of legislative action. In Holland, the amount of contention surrounding the awarding of pain & suffering awards has been reduced to a minimum. A much better system than the chaos and unfairness that seems to be the hallmarks of the U.S. tort system.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next