SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : NENG: Network Engines, Inc.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Amboy Charlie who wrote (99)12/17/2003 8:10:01 AM
From: JakeStraw  Read Replies (1) of 186
 
Shareholder Class Action Filed Against Network Engines, Inc. By The Law Firm of Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP
Tuesday December 16, 4:53 pm ET
biz.yahoo.com

BALA CYNWYD, Pa., Dec. 16 /PRNewswire/ -- The following statement was issued today by the law firm of Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP:
Notice is hereby given that a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of all purchasers of the common stock of Network Engines, Inc. (Nasdaq: NENG - News; "Network Engines" or the "Company") from November 6, 2003 through December 10, 2003, inclusive (the "Class Period").

If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP (Marc A. Topaz, Esq. or Stuart L. Berman, Esq.) toll-free at 1-888-299-7706 or 1-610-667-7706, or via e-mail at info@sbclasslaw.com.

The complaint alleges that by the start of the Class Period, defendants knew, but failed to disclose, that Network Engines was in the process of renegotiating its distribution contract with EMC, and that EMC was demanding price reductions, which, if agreed to, would negatively impact the Company's future financial results. Nevertheless, throughout the Class Period, defendants issued positive statements highlighting the Company's strong financial performance, continued growth and the success of its relationship with EMC, its largest customer. Defendants failed to disclose, however: (i) that the Company was in the process of renegotiating its distribution contract with EMC; (ii) that EMC was demanding price concessions to bring its agreement with Network Engines in line with the pricing that Network Engines was providing to other customers; (iii) that the new distribution contract with EMC would negatively impact the Company's future financial performance; (iv) that the Company would not be able to sustain the growth in its gross margins as a result of the amended contract; and (v) as a result, the Company's positive statements issued during the Class Period were materially false and misleading when made.

Finally, on December 10, 2003, the Company announced, among other things, that it had renegotiated its distribution contract with EMC and the amended contract would negatively impact the Company's gross profit related to the sale of EMC-approved Host Bus Adapters and the Company's distribution operations gross profit.

Following this announcement, shares of Network Engines common stock fell $3.92 per share, or 39%, to close at $6.10 per share, on extraordinarily high trading volume, and have continued to decline since that time.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of class members and is represented by the law firm of Schiffrin & Barroway, which prosecutes class actions in both state and federal courts throughout the country. Schiffrin & Barroway is a driving force behind corporate governance reform, and has recovered in excess of a billion dollars on behalf of institutional and high net worth individual investors. For more information about Schiffrin & Barroway, or to sign up to participate in this action online, please visit sbclasslaw.com.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext