Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Edscharp who wrote (33164)	12/20/2003 12:33:30 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) of 89467

This issue is not very correlated to Bush although some of the early non-responses tried to make it so. As for: Also, who will decide what constitutes a relgious symbol? Suppose Christians are banned from wearing crucifixes. Suppose 10% of all Christians then decide to start wearing green colored belts as expressions of their faith. Do you ban green belts too? These kinds of laws are silly, stupid and unenforceable. The differnce is that schools are a govt sponsored entity. No one is telling people what they can do in general public. Do you believe schools have the right to ban nazi symbols, gang symbols, gang colors? If so, how does banning crosses differ? This is not an easy issue. M

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next