Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: E who wrote (20660)	12/20/2003 6:08:28 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) of 793824

NO, it is like precisely what I said. Let's stick to the facts. You said...... "On historical revisionism by the Bush administration" ""Modifying the contents" is not what they've done. They're lying about what they said. They're saying they said things historically that they didn't say. That is not "modifying." It is revising the record." "Am I right to get the impression that you don't find objectionable the Bush Administration's revising the historical record" "Because you have no problem with "modifying" of the historical record. Which is, as I've pointed out, different from modifying your current position on the record." I stand by my reply...... Where exactly has anyone from the Bush Administration denied or disavowed the purged comment by Natsios? Has anyone from the Bush Administration ever claimed this comment was not made? I am not particularly happy about removing the statement, but claiming that the Bush Administration is revising history based solely on the removal of the comment is dubious at best.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next