SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: E who wrote (20662)12/20/2003 11:49:40 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 793801
 
I know a lot of information was removed from on-line access after 9/11. Maps, diagrams, descriptions, including, I assume, the location of the Aberdeen weapons base, which is actually a very sensitive place, militarily.

A good navigation map of the Chesapeake Bay area would be about all one needed for monitoring discharge of effluents, and then you'd have to be able to collect and test water samples from a small boat. That's the way that is done. Copies of internal monitoring and tests could be achieved via FOIA - assuming that the composition of the effluent isn't classified. But the source you cite says that the citizens wanted information on tracking the pollution sources - it's almost definitely a point source, wouldn't you think? And you can't really expect a map of the discharge point.

At any rate, we're speaking at the level of broad generalities, which conveys almost no useful information. I am a splitter, not a lumper. Excessive lumping makes me itchy.

That's why I asked about specific information you were deprived of, if any.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext