SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : The Flu - ID biomedical

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10PreviousNext  
To: Keith Fauci who started this subject12/21/2003 11:32:47 AM
From: Keith Fauci   of 2
 
It seems that the stock is undiscovered in the United States so far.

ID BIOMEDICAL REPORTS POSITIVE RESULTS FROM HUMAN CHALLENGE STUDY OF FLUINSURE™ VACCINE

• One dose regimen 94% protective against clinical influenza
• Two dose regimens 100% protective against clinical influenza
• 2003 field efficacy study to test one dose and lower two dose regimen

Vancouver, BC - September 18, 2003 – ID Biomedical announced today that preliminary data from its most recent influenza challenge study of FluINsure™ showed significant reductions in clinical illness across all vaccine regimens tested when compared with placebo. The trial compared subjects who had received placebo with subjects who had received the same one-and two-dose regimens studied previously, and also a two dose regimen in which the vaccine dose was halved. In a somewhat unexpected result, this latter reduced-dose regimen proved to be as effective as the higher two-dose regimen. Further, the one dose regiment was highly efficacious in protecting against fever, which will be a critical criterion of clinical influenza in any field efficacy studies. As a result, ID Biomedical will be studying this reduced-dose two-dose regimen, as well as the one dose regimen in a field study scheduled to begin in October 2003.

As in the prior human “challenge” trial, volunteers were selected for low pre-existing antibody titers to the challenge virus (A/Panama/2007/99), then assigned in a randomized and blinded manner to receive placebo (N=24), a single intranasal dose of FluINsure™ of 30 µg (N=19), two intranasal doses of 30 µg (N=16), or a new regimen consisting of two intranasal doses of 15 µg (N=19). Approximately one month after the vaccine regimen was completed; volunteers were challenged intranasally with the same dose of A/Panama/2007/99 virus used in the prior study. Study doctors then monitored subjects for seven days for fever, upper respiratory symptoms, cough or abnormal physical signs in their chest exam, and systemic symptoms such as weakness, fatigue, muscle aches, and headache.

The current results of the study are preliminary and reflect clinical data only. Laboratory confirmation of influenza infection is ongoing.

Among vaccine-treated subjects, 18 of 19 one-dose recipients (94%), and 100% of two-dose recipients at both dose levels, were protected from fever. In comparison with placebo recipients, these results represent 75% efficacy in the prevention of febrile illness among one-dose recipients and 100% efficacy in two-dose recipients. The one- and two-dose treatment groups did not significantly differ from one another; but the comparison of all vaccine-treated subjects with placebo demonstrated a clear protective effect of FluINsure™ against febrile illness (91% overall efficacy against febrile illness, p = 0.009, Fisher’s exact test). Prevention of fever is especially important because both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada have recently recommended that, in field efficacy studies, the Company must use fever as a central component of its clinical definition of influenza illness. Thus, prevention of fever will equate to the prevention of influenza in any proposed pivotal studies.

Systemic illness symptoms of any sort were noted in only 11% of one-dose FluINsure™ group and 9% of two-dose FluINsure™ recipients; versus 38% of placebo recipients. Once again, the three FluINsure™ treatment groups were not significantly different from each other; and demonstrated a pooled efficacy rate of 73% against systemic illness when compared with placebo (p = 0.008, Fisher’s exact test).

There were no lower respiratory symptoms or signs detected in any of the subjects in this study, a planned feature of the challenge model to protect subject safety. Efficacy against any upper respiratory symptoms was less than efficacy against fever and systemic illness symptoms. However, although some vaccinated subjects attained the relatively sensitive definition of upper respiratory illness (which required only one symptom or finding such as red throat, stuffy nose, etc.), secondary data indicated the intensity of upper respiratory symptoms was substantially reduced in the one and two dose vaccinated groups. For example, mean and median daily use of tissues in connection with nasal symptoms were reduced 3 to 4 fold in all FluINsure™ treatment groups relative to placebo (p = 0.043). Further, the Company noted in its previous challenge study that mild upper respiratory symptoms did not correlate with laboratory confirmed influenza infection.

Analyses of all serum and mucosal antibody responses, as well as laboratory confirmed influenza infection and viral shedding data from this trial will be completed in November. Cumulative results to date from both challenge studies will be presented at the international conference: Options for Control of Influenza V, in Okinawa, Japan on October 10, 2003.

“These are important and encouraging results,” said Dr. Louis Fries, M.D., ID Biomedical’s Vice President of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs. “First of all, the data validate the results of our first challenge trial, which is not trivial considering the complexity of this challenge model. In addition, all of the FluINsure™ regimens have substantial efficacy against clinical illness. This is critically important, because our discussions with both FDA and Health Canada have clearly indicated that preventing illness complicated by fever will be a key component of the definition of efficacy for future phase III trials.” Added Fries, “It will be important to obtain the full results of this study, including laboratory confirmation of influenza, but it is now highly unlikely that any result would modify our intention to test both a single-dose and a two-dose regimen, the latter employing a lowered dose level, in the upcoming field study.”

“This data is very exciting as it further confirms FluINsure’s ability to prevent influenza” stated Anthony Holler, M.D., ID Biomedical’s Chief Executive Officer. “These new data certainly indicate that we are continuing on a very positive track. We look forward to putting FluINsure™ to the test of a large scale field study later this year.”

click here to go back to "Press Archives"
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10PreviousNext