SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Claude Cormier who wrote (25806)12/21/2003 1:29:59 PM
From: hank2010  Read Replies (4) of 39344
 
Claude: Even if the recovery is up around 80%, the presence of the galena means cyanide leach is not going to work. Cyanide, per pound is worth 5 or 6 times the price of lead. The cyanide will attach to and get consumed by the lead before the silver will. That means one needs a higher cost crush, grind, and then either flotation or gravity concentration method. And then, that leaves one with a lead concentrate, which, unless it is a high grade concentrate, without any of a host of deleterious materials, may not have a buyer!

I am reminded of a recent conversation with a fellow over in Colorado. He made a couple of thousand tons of gravity con, (from a small, narrow vein operation), with about $2000 per ton of gold and silver, that he tried, unsuccessfully, to sell to my neighbor. Smelter at East Helena is now closed and Trail was not interested either. He says he is rapidly coming to the conclusion that he has created a multi-million dollar pile of hazardous waste!

Eric has made some very valid points about a host of potentially negative concerns. There are a whole lot of opportunities out there. Why take the risk on this one? And I rhetorically ask that question of the company as well as investors.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext