Well I said that my last post was the last, but Geneat since you've successfully baited me into responding by calling my character into question, then you have the priviledge of getting my last word.
My last word to Faris was not "tricky" and no way was inconsistent with what I have said before. I stated that I would not make the content of my conversation I had with Huddleston "public" and have not done so, we talked for at least 10 minutes and I can assure you that I have not violated my pledge to him not to repeat our conversation a la Razor and still have not done so. I have stated publicly on the basis of that conversation, I would not treat AIPN as "investment" quality stock, only trading. I personally differentiate between the two and everyone is entitled to their own opinion about that.
I sincerely regret making the "your post is reasonable" message, not because I did not consider it so at the time, but looking back in hindsite, I realize that people reading that message would interpret it to mean whatever their current bias was, so I probably should have said nothing. Please go back and reread your post that I said was reasonable. As the reader at the time, I was focusing on the comments you made regarding Huddleston maintaining that the stock was speculative in nature and that the investors should be aware of that. I will re-iterate that I consider the post was reasonable, anyone seeing this post right now, please go back and re-read his message without any bias toward or against the stock and if you don't think the message was an effort to be balanced, therefore reasonable, fine. Again a matter of opinion. It was simply my opinion at the time that Geneat was making a case for potential reward, but emphasizing the potential risk. Perhaps, I misunderstood your motives, hmmmmm Geneat?
Now, this is my last post to you or anyone else on this thread, I will not be baited into responding further, please do not waste any of your or my time. Good luck to those invested. bp |
