SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (122009)12/24/2003 11:41:50 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Regarding the post- war operations:

The problem is that if we had occupied in force, or acted more aggressively without real intelligence to suppress the resistance, we would have created a much more hostile populace. We would have had to have battered down a lot of doors, and detained a lot of civilians, without much discrimination, as well as appearing to sit on the country with more intent to stay. Unfortunately, by missing Saddam during major operations, and due to a better organized last ditch effort than we anticipated, the situation got very dicey. However, it was always a matter of time to deal with Saddam and others in the leadership of the Ba'athist Party, to develop intelligence assets sufficient to mount a more aggressive, but tailored, response, and to increase the participation of native security personnel in order to show our good faith in planning to turn things over as the situation permitted. Now, the tide is turning, and we should see much more rapid progress in the next few months.......
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext