Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (21763)	12/27/2003 1:51:58 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) of 793600

Once again I challenge your example. Please tell me where the bias is in this. The bias lies in the appalling lack of judgement that would let her just stand up and repeat those words without distancing herself from their content in any discernible way. Just for comparison, substitute one of Pat Robertson's or Jerry Falwell's more off-the-wall screeds for Saddam's propaganda. Would Diane Sawyer ever just repeat "he has often said that decadence and the practice of abortion is destroying the moral character of America and making us deserve these attacks," or whatever it was that Falwell said? Can you see her just repeating a paragraph of words like that, without making it crystal clear that she did not countenance them in any way, as she did for Saddam?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next