SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (122265)12/28/2003 7:18:13 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
Iraq has the capacity to buy what it needs through oil money. Otherwise, it would not have had the fourth largest military establishment in the world. It was clearly superior to the regimes of Arabia, and therefore could easily have gained their wealth, as well, had the will of the United States to resist faltered. But the main thing is not, in fact, the ability of the Iraqis to field and supply a conventional force, but their ability to research, construct, and amass a stockpile of unconventional weapons, and particularly to use them clandestinely, either through Iraqi intelligence or proxies. In any event, if it is necessary to say, I have no doubt that Iraq could not accomplish its greatest ambitions, but that does not mean that it could not create havoc in the attempt. So, yes, Iraq was not as great a threat as German, in terms of being able to conquer and hold territory, but......so what? It may have had, or been ready to develop, at least as great a capacity to amass corposes, through the greater efficiency of WMDs........
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext