SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (122316)12/28/2003 7:52:20 AM
From: Sig  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
cnn.netscape.cnn.com
This article make me think about what imminent danger may mean.
This required funding, pilots, planning, access to airports, and time and the target could have been Western interests
Pre-emptive action would have been needed to prevent it,
and at what time beforehand should some action be planned or started by the intended victim when the enemy is 1/2 a world away and behind closed borders?
If a meteor were observed to be on course for earth to arrive in 2009 would we be in imminent danger? And at what time should we take pre-emptive action or start to develop rockets that could intercept or deflect it?
If Saddam had been permitted to continue undeterred to
improve the range of his rockets which could then reach Israel, SA, or our ME military bases by early 2004, would that be an imminemt threat to US interests and at what time
should pre-emptive action have been planned or begun ?
I month before the planned assault ( an unknown date)?
2 months?. A year?
Sig
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News