Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 48.60

+3.5%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Amy J who wrote (176289)	12/29/2003 6:54:05 AM
From: rkral	Read Replies (2) of 186894

OT ... Amy, re Craig Barrett's statement that "Lastly, government should do no harm with rules and regulations. Expensing stock [ed: options] is a good example of doing harm. Regulations put in place in California over the last 20 years are an example of doing harm. They are making U.S. industries more non-competitive on a daily basis." There is no association between California regulations and expensing options, IMHO. I forget the logic term for the above type of argument .. but it's an implication without logical basis. It's a play on emotion, rather than an appeal to the intellect. Obviously, Craig Barrett is an extremely intelligent and capable man, but when it comes to expensing stock options, the man has blinders on. Management .. and politicians .. need to let accounting matters be decided by accountants. Regards, Ron

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next