Well if you click back there, first there was Krupp, then Manchester, followed by Churchill, in reply to which i used the term 'neocon', not 'zionist', so i stand before you humbly nuancée on that distinction
You have since pasted in the piece whole - #reply-19634768 .... Churchill is dead and gone, he saw bolshevism and wrote on it, however we are unable to read his thoughts on the progression from bolsheviks through trotskyists to the current PNAC flavour of neocontrol busheviks
Would Churchill have supported complete subjugation of the planet to a small group of ideologues? .... perhaps so, he was after all, as Nadine pointed out, a 'real old-time tory' .... i do think this arguable however - Churchill loved parliament, the cut and thrust of it for sure, but before and after that the idea of it, the idea that by freely debating ideas man will advance his species, and you cannot convince me that, given immortality, he would long stand opposed to the notion of a functional parliament of democracies
And if he did, well, why should the Rest of Us care ... |
