SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas L Nielsen who wrote (4881)1/5/2004 12:20:55 AM
From: Don Earl  Read Replies (2) of 20039
 
You sound like you've been smoking CNN floor sweepings. For starters, in case you're the only one of roughly 7 billion people who haven't seen the tape, you might want to look at it before offering a theory. This one is as good as any for a 101 class:

911research.wtc7.net

There are two very basic problems with your theory; 1. You can see the demolition charges going off, and 2. The top 30 floors are chopped to power by those charges before the bottom 80 begin to disintegrate.

Some other points you may wish to consider:

1. Kerosene does not burn hot enough by half to melt steel.

2. All of the steel columns were encased in concrete.

3. The steel trusses were in direct contact with concrete or were wrapped in insulation with a 2 hour fire rating.

4. It's fantastically difficult to melt steel in direct contact with concrete because the concrete draws the heat away from the point you're trying to melt.

5. If you dump 30 stories worth of powdered concrete on a fuel fire, the fire will go out.

6. If you find molten steel under the pile a month after the the floor where the fire was located, 80 stories above that point was reduced to powder, a secondary cause is required to explain the fact.

There's a point where the evidence speaks for itself. The reason the implosions looked like controlled demolitions is because they were controlled demolitions. The reason you can see the detonation of explosive charges is because there were explosive charge being detonated. The reason witnesses heard bombs going off is because bombs were going off. The reason there was molten steel in a place where it couldn't exist without the aid of incendiary devices is because there were incendiary devices. The reason there was a seismic spike at the beginning of each collapse and the reason witnesses reported a huge explosion at the beginning of each collapse is because there was a huge explosion at the beginning of each collapse. The reason investigators weren't allowed on the site, and 200,000 tons of evidence was illegally destroyed, looks like a cover up is because it was a cover up.

And finally, the reason why theories such as your own look like the work of half witted traitors, is because they are the work of half witted traitors.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News