Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sully- who wrote (23082)	1/5/2004 6:07:00 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (3) of 793669

Wstr, For arguments sake, I will take on the mantra of the loyal opposition and ask you this question. If we continued to "contain" Iraq, and committed the additional forces used in iraq to afganistan and the hunt for bin laden, would be in better or worse shape today? That is how the Hillary wing of the party will spin things in 08 or in 04 if still possible. The problem with the left of the dem party is that they would have been opposed to any more action in afganistan. Betcha most of them despite the rhetoric are opposed to the war in afganistan as well. Many of them probably think we caused bin laden and so we got what we deserved. As a new yorker, plenty of the liberals here adopted that view soon after 9/11. You know, "no war for oil", bush/ashcroft as anti islam facists, cult of saddam and a new version of holocaust denial for our time and you see this in the shrinking numbers killed by saddam in their view. I guess i got away from my initial premise. mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next