Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (23072)	1/5/2004 6:10:58 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) of 793739

if the web sites talked about the health risks of various reproductive choices, then it belonged. If they didn't, then throwing this bit of info in would stick out like a sore thumb. I think we can deduce from the fact that the article was run that pros and cons of health risks were mentioned. I take your word for it that the risk of cancer does increase when a woman has an abortion without going full term first. This "Consensus Science" remark got me. Critics say the statement is misleading because a national panel of experts convened by the National Cancer Institute reviewed all the existing studies and concluded in February that there is no evidence of an increased risk. What did they do, Vote? A lot of our trouble with these issues is the people who believe that abortion is murder don't want there money used to promote it. A systemic problem.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next