Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (23147)	1/6/2004 10:25:25 AM
From: MSI	Read Replies (1) of 793648

Bzzzt! Wrong -- Good article until this: "I think his belief in the supreme importance of government in people's lives deserves debate, and represents what the Democratic party is ultimately about. " That's what the GOP wants the argument to be. The biggest joke is that Bush's GOP is remotely interested in "smaller gov't". The rhetoric is all lies, while the actions are simply towards an all-powerful central gov't run by insiders. The "supreme importance of gov't in people's lives" belief is held by both parties, which is why both parties are dangerous. The primary difference is that the radicals controlling the GOP want to take over the world and the jellyfish Washington Dems want to whine while they go along with it. Dean is starting to hold both accountable, which is why the establishments of both parties wish he would go away, but don't know quite how to do that. Dean's argument is about who runs things, insiders or outsiders. The argument about the size of gov't isn't being made by Dems, except Dean, who at least raises the bar on expectations for budget-balancing. That said, it's dumb politically for Dean to remove the mid-class tax cuts.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next