Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (23280)	1/7/2004 12:47:15 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) of 793698

When I was just starting out, I worked at a firm that handled asbestosis cases. It was the defendants and the courts that turned those into class actions, not the plaintiff lawyers. Class actions are nightmares for small firms, but gigantic plaintiff firms handle them with ease using paralegals and law clerks. John Grisham recently wrote a book about class actions that showed how they can be abused. The primary abuse, it seems to me, is compromising good cases for pennies on the dollar in order to get the gigantic legal fee payoff. However, if the legal system succeeds in getting rid of that abuse, it won't be good for defendants, I assure you. Defendants benefit the most because they've figured out ways to insure that if you pay off the lawyers, they'll go away and never come back. If you remove criminal cases and domestic cases from the list of litigated cases, what's left is mostly business against business. Even now the little guy can't afford to take on Goliath. We just settled a case that was worth a couple of million for a fraction of that because the widow couldn't afford to lose.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next