BREAKING NEWS: Powell: No proof links Saddam, al-Qaida; Think tank criticizes administration’s assessments of Iraq
The Associated Press
Updated: 3:39 p.m. ET Jan. 08, 2004
msnbc.msn.com
WASHINGTON - Secretary of State Colin Powell acknowledged Thursday that he saw no “smoking gun, concrete evidence” of ties between former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and the al-Qaida terror network, but he insisted that Iraq had dangerous weapons and needed to be disarmed by force.
Speaking at a news conference at the State Department, Powell openly disagreed with a private think tank report that maintained that Iraq was not an imminent threat to the United States. And he defended the case he made before the United Nations for a U.S.-led war to force Saddam from power.
“My presentation ... made it clear that we had seen some links and connections to terrorist organizations over time,” Powell said. “I have not seen smoking gun, concrete evidence about the connection, but I do believe the connections existed.”
Report says policy misguided
Three experts at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said in a report Thursday that the Bush administration systematically misrepresented the weapons threat from Iraq and that U.S. strategy should be revised to eliminate the policy of unilateral preventive war.
“It is unlikely that Iraq could have destroyed, hidden or sent out of the country the hundreds of tons of chemical and biological weapons, dozens of Scud missiles and facilities engaged in the ongoing production of chemical and biological weapons that officials claimed were present without the United States detecting some sign of this activity,” said the report by Jessica T. Mathews, Joseph Cirincione and George Perkovich.
Mathews is president of Carnegie, an independent research group, while Cirincione is director of the proliferation project and Perkovich is vice president for studies.
Powell noted that Saddam obviously had, and used, destructive weapons in the late 1980s and then refused for a decade to reassure the world that he had gotten rid of them.
“In terms of intention, he always had it,” Powell said. Of Carnegie’s finding that Iraq posed no imminent threat, Powell said: “They did not say it wasn’t there.”
Iraq’s nuclear program had been dismantled and there was no convincing evidence it was being revived, the report said.
And the U.S.-led war on Iraq in 1991, combined with U.N. sanctions and inspections, effectively destroyed Iraq’s ability to produce chemical weapons on a large scale, it said.
The real threat was posed by what Iraq might have been able to do in the future, such as starting production of biological weapons quickly in the event of war, Carnegie said.
Iraq apparently was also expanding its capability to build missiles beyond the range permitted by the U.N. Security Council, the report said. “The missile program appears to have been the one program in active development in 2002,” it said.
More U.N. participation urged
Years of U.N. inspections to determine whether Saddam was harboring weapons of mass destruction were working well, and the United States should jointly set up a permanent system with the United Nations to guard against the spread of dangerous technology, the report said.
It recommended that consideration be given to making the job of CIA director a career post instead of a political appointment.
Citing the CIA and other U.S. intelligence offices, the Bush administration contended that Iraq had caches of weapons of mass destruction and plans to produce more.
The Carnegie report said the U.S. intelligence process failed on Iraq and that Bush administration officials dropped qualifications and expressions of uncertainty presented by U.S. intelligence analysts.
In the weeks before the war, the administration also intensified its allegations of links between Saddam and the al-Qaida terror network headed by Osama bin Laden.
Since May, when Bush declared an end to major combat, 357 U.S. service personnel have died in attacks on them and in accidents. |
