SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush Bashers & Wingnuts

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Red Heeler who wrote (335)1/9/2004 3:42:32 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) of 1347
 
steal the US Presidential election
With the approval of the highest court in the land. Which by definition makes it legal and therefore not theft.

invade a sovereign nation without cause
What causes justify invasion? The action was carried out with the approval of the US Congress as provided for by the War Powers Act. Which makes it legal under US law.

They have violated international laws.
Name 'em.

BTW, in reality "international law is at the warhead of a missile. It's a jungle out there.

They have violated the Geneva Convention.
Prove it.

Should they be tried by US Courts, international courts, or both?
Getting back to our little story, the men were tried IN SECRET in MILITARY courts- -in spite of the fact that they themselves were in no nation's military forces.

They were found guilty and executed. Secretly.

In spite of
Amendment V.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger;
...................................................

Amendment VI.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.


Was the name of the President in whose administration this was done "Adolph Hitler"?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext