SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Rarely is the question asked: "is our children learning"

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SalemsHex who wrote (1756)1/9/2004 4:49:46 PM
From: SalemsHex  Read Replies (1) of 2171
 
There was a time when I respected Powell, but not anymore. Don't know how he lives with himself. I'd guess its pretty tough...and I'll also bet he wished he'd never gotten involved with this Nazi Regime.

Powell stands by disputed claims
From correspondents in Washington
January 10, 2004

THE Bush administration defended its case for going to war in Iraq yesterday after an influential Washington think tank accused US officials of "systematically" inflating the threat from Saddam Hussein's weapons programs.

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said in a report that the US also misrepresented the findings of UN weapons inspectors in a bid to strengthen its push for military action against Iraq.

In response, US Secretary of State Colin Powell admitted yesterday he had not seen "smoking gun, concrete evidence" of Iraqi links with terrorism but insisted Hussein was a threat that had to be dealt with.

Mr Powell said he remained confident in the case against Iraq he put to the UN Security Council in a presentation on February 5 last year.

"I'm confident of what I presented last year, the intelligence community is confident of the material they gave me," he said.

"I was representing them. It was information they presented to the Congress. It was information they had presented publicly and they stand behind it. And this game is still unfolding."

But the Carnegie foundation report, WMD in Iraq: Evidence and Implications, said: "Administration officials systematically misrepresented the threat from Iraq's WMD and ballistic missile programs."

It added that US intelligence "appears to have been unduly influenced by policymakers' views".

The foundation said the US Government should enlist UN help to draw up "a complete history and inventory" of Iraq's WMD and missile programs and establish an independent commission to establish what intelligence services knew about Iraqi weapons.

The Carnegie said the US administration misrepresented UN "inspectors' findings in ways that turned threats from minor to dire".

It said inspections by UN weapons experts "were on track to find what was there" and that international sanctions and import/export controls were "considerably" more effective than was thought.

The foundation said there was "no solid evidence" to back administration claims of a close relationship between Hussein and Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network.


news.com.au
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext