SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mcg404 who wrote (20050)1/9/2004 7:00:05 PM
From: IngotWeTrust  Read Replies (1) of 81996
 
mcg rhetorical musings aloud continue...<font color=slateblue>Should the battle lines be re-drawn: not business versus government and business versus labor but rather big versus small?</font>

Draw your battle lines in your own mind whereever you want.

Me and other miners? We'll sit out your battle.

I'm not aware of any miner who doesn't want to get bigger, find more gold, prove up more reserves, claim more land, and then patent it--all eminating from low economic barrier entry fee of $100 for $20 acres plus filing fees and annual proof of labor or payment of assessment fees with required forms and filings.

You haven't touched on our mining issues at all. It isn't big vs little, it isn't gov't vs business, it isn't price of gold. It is another matter entirely, and purely based in wolf-ish greed dressed in environmental sheepskins.

Contorted fabrications and extrapolations you've posited from your horizontal "high-ground" has nothing to do with the $10M rhetorical valued land for a mere $10,000 Barrick deal mining issue upon which I'm focused like a laser beam.

Babbit did worse with his Utal Coal deal to China under Clinton. You going to give "democrat -ectomy" equal time?

Somehow I doubt it...

next? Nope, I'm bored.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext