SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (180274)1/9/2004 7:20:11 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 1578204
 
Ted, All the more reason Clinton may have prevented a second attack. But in any case, the second attack happened on Bush's watch. For that reason, I could care less what Clinton would have done. Bush was president, not Clinton.

He had pretty much most of his two terms to prevent it, but did nothing except lob a few cruise missiles into empty tents.

Plus the 9/11 terrorists entered the country under Clinton's watch, trained to fly under Clinton's watch, and started planning the dastardly deed under Clinton's watch. Of course, I'm sure Clinton was aware of this all along, but just decided not to catch them because his term was up in January of 2001.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News