World Affairs Discussion Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : World Affairs Discussion

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3214)	1/9/2004 8:33:09 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) of 3959

Btw, did you like Bill Clinton's approach to Iraq? I did some reading and research on this issue after you posted this on the thread. It seems that even during his tenure, he had access to considerable intelligence on Saddam and WMD. He made many public comments and even threatened to invade Iraq to destroy those weapons. And since he is a ex-President, he knows the challenges. That is why he has come to the aid of Bush. mailman.lbo-talk.org Now moving along, let us not fail to realize this. Clinton, even though he had all the information about WMD "however credible" they may have been, worked with the other countries of the world. He did not get their OK and hence refrained from order the US military into Iraq to take them out. Bush on the other hand, cares least bit about other countries in the world that do matter such as France, Germany etc. He was in a hurry to go in, and once he went in again he was in a hurry to declare the completion of operations (I have taken care to avoid saying Mission Accomplished) The thief got away into Syria and now what? We don't want the US to look that stupid singly, do you? Now Bushies are pointing to Clinton to help out in the situation?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next