SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (180278)1/9/2004 8:49:11 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1578119
 
Ted, All the more reason Clinton may have prevented a second attack. But in any case, the second attack happened on Bush's watch. For that reason, I could care less what

Clinton would have done. Bush was president, not Clinton.
He had pretty much most of his two terms to prevent it, but did nothing except lob a few cruise missiles into empty tents.


First, if you think the capture of OBL will take care of the problem, you are badly deluding yourself. OBL is the face of al Qaeda...........the body is a cell network that covers the globe. OBL goes; a new guy takes his place.

Secondly, for the last time, 9/11 happened on Bush's watch. Stop trying to divert blame to Clinton.

Plus the 9/11 terrorists entered the country under Clinton's watch, trained to fly under Clinton's watch, and started planning the dastardly deed under Clinton's watch. Of course, I'm sure Clinton was aware of this all along, but just decided not to catch them because his term was up in January of 2001.

If he was aware, then he needs be to brought to court as well.

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext