SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (3474)1/10/2004 10:09:30 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Read Replies (1) of 37274
 
The negative aspects of FPTP does not really apply to electing a single person for a signle job (like a mayor).

The problem is when electing many persons for "the same job", i.e. parliament. (because so many voters in every FPTP district become un-represented, the winner-takes-all aspect)

For mayors, presidents, etc one assures, at a minimum, a 50% support by run-offs (?), first having many candidates, if nobody gets 50% votes, the two with the most go to the final. (this also often eliminates extremists
and favors cooperation around the moderate center)

That is, was it a two-stage, first multi-candidate, then two-candidtae eletion??
(however, if the parliament-elections are FPTP, run-offs pretty much lose the meaning they
have in PR, multi-party systems)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext