SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tekboy who wrote (123013)1/11/2004 12:55:54 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Compare that to the folks who said that the war itself would be a disaster, or the folks who said Saddam was behind 9/11. Until they do their own 'splaining, they don't deserve a hearing on anything else.


Um, doesn't that first category include France, Germany and the entire UN? You know, 3 million refugees, Stanlingrad-on-the-Tigris, all that? Funny enough, none of these characters even seem to realize that they even have a credibility problem -g-

As for the second category, who is actually in it? I don't know anyone in the Administration who said this, and many, like Cheney and Perle, have said there is no evidence. If they make it clear that they still have their own suspicions, there is no evidence to lay these suspicions to rest, either, not until we get to the bottom of what Iraqi Intelligence was doing with Ansar Al Islam and who was training at Salman Pak.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext